- From: Markus Krötzsch <mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:40:48 +0100
- To: semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
- Cc: "Peter Ansell" <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, "Peter Krantz" <peter.krantz@gmail.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-Id: <200803141440.54264.mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>
On Freitag, 14. März 2008, Peter Ansell wrote: > On 14/03/2008, Peter Krantz <peter.krantz@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > The semantic web has some interesting implications for us. One is the > > focus on being specific with what you mean when you make statements > > about things. Previously, this work was implicitly done by software > > developers in an organization (in code). With semantic web technology, > > this work can be moved to where it belongs - to the domain experts. > > > > I have been looking for tools to help domain experts create models of > > their domain in a way that hides the gory details of OWL et al. One > > thing that would be very powerful is a domain model wiki tool where > > page templates had some predefined fields that mapped to OWL. This > > would allow multiple domain experts to contribute their knowledge into > > a domain model, ready for publication on the web. > > > > Does anyone know of such a tool? I guess I am looking for a simpler > > web based multi-user version of Protege. > > > > Regards, > > > > Peter Krantz > > Semantic Mediawiki uses basic templates to produce rdf. I could see it > being applicable, although whether it maps nicely to the way OWL > ontologies are set out would have to be discovered. There is no reason > why the ontology couldn't logically be produced as OWL files are based > on RDF which is reportedly fully supported. > Maybe I can provide some further clarification. Semantic MediaWiki (SMW) [1] is a semantic extension to MediaWiki, with its first target being to support knowledge articulation in existing wikis (e.g. it is now supported by Wikia, a major wiki-hosting service with 5000+ sites). This is why it focusses more on instance data than on schematic (ontological) information. SMW is based on OWL, but employs only a small fragment thereof (basically property and class hierarchies, equalities, facts, as well as some more complex queries that could be understood as OWL-class instance retrieval). It does not support free-form RDF or OWL-Full-specific constructs. All data can be obtained in OWL/RDF XML-serialisations, and we also will soon supply direct RDF store bindings that would then provide SPARQL interfaces. Binding SMW to an OWL-reasoner that maintains further (more complex) schematic data would also be possible with that architecture -- a first prototype for that was already realised some time ago [2]. We envision to further extend SMW with more powerful OWL constructs, but usability and computability is of course not so easy to achieve in a light-weight web context. Tractable fragments of OWL, as discussed in the OWL1.1 context, are therefore our main target formalism. Regards, Markus [1] http://semantic-mediawiki.org [2] http://korrekt.org/page/Reusing_Ontological_Background_Knowledge_in_Semantic_Wikis > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Semediawiki-devel mailing list > Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel -- Markus Krötzsch Institut AIFB, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), 76128 Karlsruhe phone +49 (0)721 608 7362 fax +49 (0)721 608 5998 mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de www http://korrekt.org
Received on Friday, 14 March 2008 13:41:32 UTC