- From: Golda Velez <gv@btucson.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:20:33 -0700
- To: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
On Monday 10 March 2008 12:50, Story Henry wrote: > What we could develop btw, which would be RDF friendly, would be > simple propositional attitudes towards contents of resources > such as > > :me dontBelieve :joesFoafFile . > > That would be a little bit like the <a rel="nofollow" > href="blahblah" ...> link . > > A simple vocabulary like that would be useable with the new quad > stores that are being developed, and may even not require too much > work developing. Sure, and there are some if you want only to talk about resources. TLD, Annotea let you do some of that and I love that it is easy to make a vocabulary to say what you want. But, when you say you 'dontBelieve' a resource, what are you saying? You don't believe anything in it? You don't believe Joe wrote it? You don't believe it exists? If RDF is used to represent knowledge, why aren't we saying 'dontBelieve' about an RDF triple? Ok, I know I'm beating a horse here, I'll try and stop...you guys are doing the work to build this, I'm just a demanding user ;-) --Golda
Received on Monday, 10 March 2008 22:10:17 UTC