Re: FOAF OWL DL

Thank you very much, but I can't understand why the xml base is not defined.

Bojars, Uldis wrote:
> The URL (http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/) that Cristiano points to is just a snapshot of an older version of the FOAF ontology. You may want to use the latest version available from http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/index.rdf
>
> Uldis
>
> [ http://captsolo.net/ ]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: semantic-web-request@w3.org on behalf of Alan Ruttenberg
> Sent: Tr 2008.06.11. 16:48
> To: Cristiano Longo
> Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
> Subject: Re: FOAF OWL DL
>  
>
> It's OWL, but not OWL-DL.
> I would very much like there to be an OWL-DL version too, or at least  
> to factor it into two components - an OWL-DL portion, and a set of  
> further axioms that are imported by OWL full users.
>
> -Alan
>
> On Jun 11, 2008, at 5:08 AM, Cristiano Longo wrote:
>
>   
>> Morning all,
>> I wonder to use foaf elements in my OWL DL ontology.  Do someone  
>> experienced  some  OLW DL foaf version? Do exists a recommended  
>> one? I found just   http://attempto.ifi.uzh.ch/site/docs/OWL_to_ACE/ 
>> foaf.owl. What do you think about it?
>>
>> Thank you in advance,
>> Cristiano Longo
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 12 June 2008 13:34:34 UTC