W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > June 2008

RE: FOAF OWL DL

From: Bojars, Uldis <uldis.bojars@deri.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:43:09 +0100
Message-ID: <316ADBDBFE4F4D4AA4FEEF7496ECAEF9834DA0@EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie>
To: "Bojars, Uldis" <uldis.bojars@deri.org>, "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, "Cristiano Longo" <cristiano.longo@tvblob.com>
Cc: <semantic-web@w3.org>


Sorry, I meant http://attempto.ifi.uzh.ch/site/docs/OWL_to_ACE/foaf.owl by the URL pointed to by Cristiano.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Bojars, Uldis
Sent: Tr 2008.06.11. 19:38
To: Alan Ruttenberg; Cristiano Longo
Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Subject: RE: FOAF OWL DL
 

The URL (http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/) that Cristiano points to is just a snapshot of an older version of the FOAF ontology. You may want to use the latest version available from http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/index.rdf

Uldis

[ http://captsolo.net/ ]

-----Original Message-----
From: semantic-web-request@w3.org on behalf of Alan Ruttenberg
Sent: Tr 2008.06.11. 16:48
To: Cristiano Longo
Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Subject: Re: FOAF OWL DL
 

It's OWL, but not OWL-DL.
I would very much like there to be an OWL-DL version too, or at least  
to factor it into two components - an OWL-DL portion, and a set of  
further axioms that are imported by OWL full users.

-Alan

On Jun 11, 2008, at 5:08 AM, Cristiano Longo wrote:

>
> Morning all,
> I wonder to use foaf elements in my OWL DL ontology.  Do someone  
> experienced  some  OLW DL foaf version? Do exists a recommended  
> one? I found just   http://attempto.ifi.uzh.ch/site/docs/OWL_to_ACE/ 
> foaf.owl. What do you think about it?
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Cristiano Longo
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 18:45:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:41:10 UTC