- From: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:40:05 +1000
- To: "Hugh Glaser" <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
2008/7/25 Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>: > > The discussion on "About computer-optimized RDF format" has reminded me of > an issue I have been pondering, as it is certainly an option to communicate > compressed ntriples. > We have quite a lot of RDF that is in different RDF formats. > > It seems that people think that RDF/XML is RDF, and don't notice turtle and > n3; in some sense this is not surprising, as the only registered MIME type, > I think, is application/rdf+xml. > So coming to the Cool URIs, the paper makes no mention of what to do with > other formats, so perhaps it could be updated to provide advice on best > practice for application/x-turtle (or application/turtle soon?) and > text/rdf+n3. > > I think there are some questions here; certainly having a policy might be > good for future compatibility. > For example: Does the content negotiation on the > http://www.acme.com/id/alice include the other MIME types? If so, does it go > to http://www.acme.com/data/alice, where there is more content negotiation, > or each to a different URI? > > > Of course my apologies if I have missed this somewhere. > > Best > Hugh > > PS > Of course the other strand, http://www.acme.com/people/alice, might also > have alternative reps, such as html and pdf, but it is the RDF that I am > concerned about at the moment. I may be confused, but under the 303 redirect model are you allowed to do multiple redirects. I know that under the HTTP standard you can do as many redirects as needed provided a user agent is willing to follow them all. but if the 303 is supposed to point from a pseudo-real-resource URI to an information-resource then does it chain? If it does then dealing with those extra mime types would just be an issue for the application. Ie, replace application/rdf+xml in the document with your favourite format and see if you get something suitable back, else try again with your second-favourite format etc. I think the "cool" thing about the URI's is that they don't require the format to be a particular value inately, although it would be nice if the resulting format that comes back the first time has links directly to the other formats. ie, HTML with link rel=alternate etc to avoid guessing which formats are available. Cheers, Peter PS. Maybe I missed something also!
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:40:41 UTC