- From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:31:58 +0100
- To: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
The discussion on "About computer-optimized RDF format" has reminded me of an issue I have been pondering, as it is certainly an option to communicate compressed ntriples. We have quite a lot of RDF that is in different RDF formats. It seems that people think that RDF/XML is RDF, and don't notice turtle and n3; in some sense this is not surprising, as the only registered MIME type, I think, is application/rdf+xml. So coming to the Cool URIs, the paper makes no mention of what to do with other formats, so perhaps it could be updated to provide advice on best practice for application/x-turtle (or application/turtle soon?) and text/rdf+n3. I think there are some questions here; certainly having a policy might be good for future compatibility. For example: Does the content negotiation on the http://www.acme.com/id/alice include the other MIME types? If so, does it go to http://www.acme.com/data/alice, where there is more content negotiation, or each to a different URI? Of course my apologies if I have missed this somewhere. Best Hugh PS Of course the other strand, http://www.acme.com/people/alice, might also have alternative reps, such as html and pdf, but it is the RDF that I am concerned about at the moment.
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2008 14:33:27 UTC