Re: PURL URIs for RDF-S and OWL Vocabularies

Mark,
This is the new software they are planning on deploying.
http://purlz.org/



----- Original Message ----
From: Mark Diggory <mdiggory@MIT.EDU>
To: martin.hepp@unibw.de
Cc: semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 9:26:07 AM
Subject: Re: PURL URIs for RDF-S and OWL Vocabularies

I read somewhere that the next version of the PURL service software (and that running at OCLC) will support choosing the redirection code, so that 303's will be possible.

-Mark


On Jul 16, 2008, at 7:06 AM, Martin Hepp wrote:

Dear all:

Are there any strong opinions in favor of or against using PURLs (http://www.purl.org) for serious ontology projects?

I was glad to find respective recipes at

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/http-examples/2005-11-18/#purls

but would like to know what other think on moving a non-toy ontology to the purl.org space.

Best

Martin

-----------------------------------
martin hepp, http://www.heppnetz.de
mhepp@computer.org, skype mfhepp

<martin_hepp.vcf>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mark R. Diggory - DSpace Developer and Systems Manager
MIT Libraries, Systems and Technology Services
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Home Page: http://purl.org/net/mdiggory/homepage