- From: Aldo Bucchi <aldo.bucchi@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:55:54 -0400
- To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@pioneerca.com>
- Cc: "Golda Velez" <gv@btucson.com>, bnowack@semsol.com, semantic-web@w3.org
Yes, I can also relate to your problem. I had a hard time minting up an Ontology for an e-commerce website, which one would think is a very popular domain. Richard mentions CyC and Wordnet. That is still too geeky for most developers out there... but I think everyone can relate to wikipedia. I think what we are missing here is what schemaweb set off to do in the first place, but with added "social" features ( popularity rankings ) and some discussion groups. Who's in charce of schemaweb? Best, A On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Richard H. McCullough <rhm@pioneerca.com> wrote: > I agree with you completely! I have the same problem with OpenCyc KB. > But OpenCyc is making progress. > 1. They added a "Concept Browser" -- a nice HTTP interface that lets you > scroll through KB entries with similar names. They have also added HTTP > "services" that you can use to get important properties of concepts. > 2. They are integrating with the Wikipedia knowledge base. > 3. Past work has already linked them with WordNet info. > Dick > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Golda Velez" <gv@btucson.com> > To: <bnowack@semsol.com> > Cc: "Aldo Bucchi" <aldo.bucchi@gmail.com>; <semantic-web@w3.org> > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 2:36 PM > Subject: Re: "State of the Semantic Web" - personal opinions? > > >> >> For what its worth, I think that its not only UI. My biggest problem when >> with real motivation I try to get some sensible linked data to put on my >> local-content websites, is that it is difficult to discover what are the >> most useful vocab terms to use in a query. I think one big thing we need >> (and maybe its there but I haven't found it) is a way to query a repository >> as to what are the most frequent and most unique terms available for >> queries. >> >> --Golda >> >> On Jul 1, 2008, at 3:13 AM, Benjamin Nowack wrote: >> >>> >>> On 01.07.2008 00:06:53, Aldo Bucchi wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes, UI has been completely neglected. We need cross fertilization... >>>> and we can't expect them ( UI developers ) to spend months learning >>>> semweb details. We need bring the goods to their door step and in >>>> their own terms. >>>> >>>> My 2 cents: >>>> >>>> http://www.semanticflash.org/ >>> >>> Great to see this! I'm not a Flash developer myself, but learned >>> a lot from Flash UI folks, getting them on board would be priceless. >>> >>> It would be cool to see milestones announced on this list (or on >>> public-semweb-ui[1], which could really benefit from some non-CFP >>> traffic). >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Benji >>> >>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-ui/ >>> >>> -- >>> Benjamin Nowack >>> http://bnode.org/ >>> >>> >>>> -- >>>> :::: Aldo Bucchi :::: >>>> +56 9 7623 8653 >>>> skype:aldo.bucchi >>>> http://aldobucchi.com/ >>>> >>> >> >> >> > Dick McCullough > http://mKRmKE.org/ > Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done; > knowledge := man do identify od existent done; > knowledge haspart proposition list; > mKE do enhance od "Real Intelligence" done; > > > -- :::: Aldo Bucchi :::: +56 9 7623 8653 skype:aldo.bucchi http://aldobucchi.com/
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2008 16:56:34 UTC