- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@pioneerca.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:13:27 -0700
- To: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: "Semantic Web at W3C" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "KR-language" <KR-language@YahooGroups.com>, "cyclify austin" <cyclify-austin@YahooGroups.com>
OK. now I'm confused. Since Thing type Class; then Thing is a Class and an Individual. It's hard for me to find the specific statements I want in the volumes of W3C documents. It seems to me that I recall seeing Class subClassOf Class; Is it also true that Class type Class; ??? I would guess that if we put everything together, we'll again find that Thing equivalentClass Class; And is there such a thing as Thing equivalentIndividual Class; ??? Dick McCullough Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done; mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done; knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list; http://mKRmKE.org/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org> To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@pioneerca.com> Cc: "Semantic Web at W3C" <semantic-web@w3.org>; "KR-language" <KR-language@YahooGroups.com>; "cyclify austin" <cyclify-austin@YahooGroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 4:22 PM Subject: Re: Thing and Class > > On 2008-08 -27, at 16:59, Richard H. McCullough wrote: > >> >> Since Thing subClassOf Class; > > No, Thing is not a subClassOf Class. > This has rdf:type Class. > >> [...] > >> Dick McCullough >> Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done; >> mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done; >> knowledge := man do identify od existent done; >> knowledge haspart proposition list; >> http://mKRmKE.org/ >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2008 00:14:16 UTC