Re: Thing and Class

On 27/08/2008 23:58, "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@pioneerca.com> wrote:

>
>
> I browsed through the W3C documents, and didn't find that particular
> assertion.
i.e. I can't find any reference to back up my assertion.
> But it is clearly true, since every class is a subclass of Thing.
i.e. But A is clearly true because A is true.
And you made two statements for which you were asked to provide supporting
reference or argument, but only seem to address one of the queries.
I am sorry to say that if this is the level of argument, I am disinclined to
read further posts.
I am even surprised that this email has been dignified with answers, but I
guess it shows that others have more politeness than I am able to manage.
Please try to take more care with your postings.
Hugh
>
> Dick McCullough
> Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done;
> mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done;
> knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
> knowledge haspart proposition list;
> http://mKRmKE.org/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Wallace" <mwallace@3SigmaResearch.com>
> To: <semantic-web@w3.org>
> Cc: "Semantic Web at W3C" <semantic-web@w3.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 2:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Thing and Class
>
>
>>
>> Richard H. McCullough wrote:
>>>
>>> Since  Thing  subClassOf  Class;
>> Would you please give your reference for this assertion?
>>> and     Class  subClassOf  Thing;
>> Would you please give your reference for this assertion?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Mark
>>> it follows that  Thing  equivalentClass  Class;
>>>
>>> So, I say:  get rid of Class!
>>>
>>> Dick McCullough
>>> Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done;
>>> mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done;
>>> knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
>>> knowledge haspart proposition list;
>>> http://mKRmKE.org/
>>>
>>
>> Mark Wallace
>> Chief Architect & Ontologist
>> 3-Sigma Research, Indialantic, Florida, USA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 23:36:04 UTC