- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:51:36 +0200
- To: "Tom Morris" <tom@tommorris.org>
- Cc: "Golda Velez" <gv@btucson.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
Received on Monday, 14 April 2008 16:52:13 UTC
> > It seems to me that newcomers to RDF would greatly benefit from a > > human-annotated site about ontologies, with examples, use cases, > reviews and > > maybe popularity score and often-used-with list. +1 Probably not a directly reusable idea (at least not with frames ;-), but when I first started to hit the strange little details of XML I found Tim Bray's annotated XML spec hugely helpful: http://www.xml.com/axml/testaxml.htm Hopefully a lot of this could be achieved without too much new work - exploiting linked data to connect up existing material. (Something similar for tutorials is still on my to-do list for SWEO...) > So, what vocabulary to use behind the site? ...I'll use Tom's hReview > vocab > > for the basic reviews, but does anyone know of a good vocabulary for > > attaching use cases and examples ? I put those things into > abra-discuss so > > I'll use that if there's not another standard out there. Offhand I can't think of one - but surely there's one around the W3C material somewhere, most recent specs have had some kind of use case docs..? Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com ~ http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/this_weeks_semantic_web/
Received on Monday, 14 April 2008 16:52:13 UTC