- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:02:11 -0400 (EDT)
- To: alanruttenberg@gmail.com
- Cc: henry.story@bblfish.net, garret@globalmentor.com, semantic-web@w3.org
Wouldn't it be more direct to just say that a property (e.g., Pname) has no values (for all members of a class or for an individual), as in restriction(Pname cardinality(0)) or Individual(John type(restriction(Pname cardinality(0)))) peter From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> Subject: Re: representing null in semantic frameworks Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 19:37:22 -0400 > rdf:nil is something, specifically the empty collection. > > However, there is owl:Nothing, the empty class. If you say, for > instance, that some property has allValuesFrom owl:Nothing, then it > can't have any value. There is no thing which is rdf:type owl:Nothing. > > -Alan > > On Oct 20, 2007, at 12:25 PM, Story Henry wrote: > > > There is something close. rdf:Lists terminate with a null I think. > > > > Henry > > > > On 20 Oct 2007, at 18:15, Garret Wilson wrote: > > > >> > >> As RDF evolved, was there any discussion on adding an rdf:null > >> resource---that is, a resource that represents no resource at all? > >> > >> One expected response: "My child, you're thinking like a > >> programmer again---what you really want to do is assert the > >> absence of any assertions regarding a particular subject and > >> predicate, or you want to assume a closed world and just don't > >> assert anything at all", or something like that---and I appreciate > >> this point of view to some extent. > >> > >> But as a practical matter, let's say we have a list of baseball > >> game scores. Wouldn't it be convenient for the resource at index 3 > >> to be null to indicate that there was no score that week because > >> there was a tornado that canceled the game? > >> > >> I'm not necessarily looking for a big online discussion. Just a > >> brief pointer to any reading on this subject would help. I'm sure > >> there must have been some discussion of null over the development > >> history of RDF. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Garret > > > >
Received on Monday, 22 October 2007 08:10:16 UTC