- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:21:12 -0500
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, W3C RDFa task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, office-metadata <office-metadata@lists.oasis-open.org>
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 13:51 -0500, Shane McCarron wrote: > > Dan Connolly wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 11:04 -0500, Shane McCarron wrote: > > > >> [...] > >> The names of RDFa attributes are indeed stable now, and are "namespaced" > >> in that they exist in the XHTML namespace. > >> > > > > Really? I didn't realize that. > > > > Please add a test suite to make this clear to developers. > > > Hmm - need to think on this one. Oops... I meant "please add a test to the RDFa test suite." > > The way I read Ivan's code, he didn't realize that either: > > > > http://dev.w3.org/2004/PythonLib-IH/pyRdfa/ Parse.py 15-Oct-2007 > > > Ivan has implemented a parser for XHTML+RDFa - and in that language > thare are NO namespace-qualified attribute names. Oh. Now I'm totally confused. Maybe it'll become clear to me in due course. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 15 October 2007 19:20:57 UTC