- From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:44:01 -0400
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: Tony Hammond <tony.hammond@gmail.com>, SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Bijan Parsia wrote: > Thanks for the pointers. I don't have much to say that I've not already > said. The issues you discuss vis-a-vis XMP seem more political than > technical. Clearly, there is a requirement for extensibility. Beyond > that, it's a bit hard to determine what the actual technical > requirements are (no surprise, really). I wonder if aligning XMP with > some RDFa profile would make sense. The political and the technical are hard to distinguish though. From what I know, somewhere around 2000, Adobe engineers were looking for an extensible metadata framework that could be mapped to a GUI reliably, without external configuration. So they looked at RDF as it existed and said, "ah, RDF literals are kind of like a hash, rdf:Seq, rdf:Bag, and rdf:Alt can be mapped to familiar programming structures and UIs, let's just create a subset that only allows those." So it's a bizarre sort of subset; not of the syntax, but of the model. It leans heavily on literals and blank nodes. The spec is now effectively frozen by Adobe, which has a ton of legacy issues that explain why they have no interest in turning it over to a proper standards organization, or otherwise changing it. Hence, the technical problems are closely connected to the political. > Actually, I think there's a lot of milage to be gotten out of being less > free and easy. Which I guess aligns with periodic discussions of what has been called "RDF Lite." > One problem we faced at UMD with some of our tools is > that they were *too* open and flexible. Photostuff, for example, would > build forms for "person" from all the ontologies you loaded. So you got > these HUGE forms with dozens of fields. And all you wanted to do was > mark up the photo with the fact that it was a photo of your niece. Norm Walsh had started to work on a cool web app for photo metadata. In that case, the UI gets configured. <http://norman.walsh.name/2006/09/13/photodata> Bruce
Received on Monday, 8 October 2007 02:44:12 UTC