W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > May 2007

Re: vCard/iCalendar RDF process document 2007-04-06

From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 17:13:06 +0200
To: semantic-web@w3.org
Message-id: <200705011713.08480.kjetil@kjernsmo.net>

On Saturday 28 April 2007, Garret Wilson wrote:
> It's too bad I missed that debate; there certainly doesn't seem to be
> strong feelings one way or another on this list at the moment. :) My
> feelings are pretty strong for full representation; it would be
> pitiful, in my view, if the RDF ontology data was restricted to the
> range of hCard.

OK, I can absolutely see the case for that. However, I think that for a 
lot of applications, full vCard is overkill, I've had some looks at the 
Perl module Text::vCard's parse tree, and it is pretty nasty. 

For implementers, I think it is a good thing to have a restricted set to 
relate to, so how about we define a RDF vCard Core, which is the hCard 
subset, and RDF vCard Full, which is the full vCard?


Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 15:13:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:00 UTC