- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 20:08:03 +0100
- To: "Richard Cyganiak" <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: <semantic-web@w3.org>
Richard, > The most common objections are: a) "lo-fi semantic content" > such as RSS/Atom, tags, microformats, GRDDL and RDFa are also > part of the Semantic Web [...] Mhm. I wonder where these come from ;) Till now I was just lurking around, so please be lenient toward me if I missed something ... Let me please try to clarify an issue that IMHO is important in this discussion. One should not compare oranges with apples when talking about what is 'in' and what is 'not in' (the SW). In greater detail, w.r.t. 'lo-fi semantic content' (btw, who the heck invented this one): + RSS/Atom are concrete formats + tags are a paradigm (or a concrete implementation, cf. [1]) + microformats [2], eRDF [3], and RDFa [4] are ways to _deploy_ (RDF) metadata + GRDDL [5] is a way to 'uncover' the RDF in non-RDF formats So I'd like to conclude that _all_ content, metadata, formats, etc. are welcome on the SW. We are not, I repeat, we are _not_ in the position to judge on what is a first-class citizen, and what is not. Cheers, Michael BTW: Richard - in your opinion - are relational DB systems lo-fi or hi-fi semantic content? ;) [1] http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-tag [2] http://microformats.org [3] http://research.talis.com/2005/erdf/wiki/Main/RdfInHtml [4] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/ [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/ ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA <office> phone: +43-316-876-1193 (fax:-1191) e-mail: michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at web: http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ <private> mobile: +43-660-7621761 web: http://www.sw-app.org/ ----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 9 March 2007 19:08:12 UTC