- From: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:49:45 +0100
- To: Rikkert Koppes <rikkert@finalist.com>
- CC: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, semantic-web@w3.org
Rikkert Koppes wrote: > > Sure, forbidding homonyms seems like a gooed idea It seems obvious to the point of tautology. "Universal" + "Identifier" seems to exclude homonyms. > but I wonder if this > is also possible. Doesn't homonym URI alread exist? Code dereferencing null pointers already exist. Doesn't mean it's allowed. > To illistrate an example: www.example.com might be (identified as) a > person's home page. But it might include a link element linking to an > openId endpoint (www.example.com/openId, say). We do have two different > URI's for two different things, but www.example.com is also a alias for > the openId endpoint (by virtue of the link element). It's not an alias, though you can get to "there" from "here".
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 11:50:31 UTC