- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 14:31:01 -0400
- To: "r.j.koppes" <rikkert@rikkertkoppes.com>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org, "Lynn, James (Software Escalations)" <james.lynn@hp.com>
On 2007-06 -06, at 13:13, r.j.koppes wrote: > Ok, herby a follow-up to the semantic-web list. > > To summarize: > > Me: suppose I am identified by http://www.example.com/mophor and > there is also a webpage http://www.example.com/mophor... > > Tim: this is an error, by returning a 200 for the webpage, it is > identified, so these are two different things. http:// > www.example.com/mophor#me would be ok > > James: but what about fragment identifiers? > > Tim: no problem, since the client strips off fragment identifiers, > so accessing the web page http://www.example.com/mophor#me would > identify http://www.example.com/mophor as a webpage by returning a > 200 (this is my interpretation of what is said) Woa. Stop. No. You can't access < http://www.example.com/ mophor#me> as it isn't a web page. The function 'access web page' takes a URI with no hash. The fact that the id http://www.example.com/mophor#me is used at all indicates that "http://www.example.com/mophor" identifies a document, before you even think of access it. Because the "foo#bar" means "the thing identified by the local id bar within foo" in the web architecture. You can look up < http://www.example.com/mophor#me> which means, on the CLIENT, stripping off the "#me"
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 18:31:06 UTC