- From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:36:27 -0400
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- CC: Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com>, andy.seaborne@hp.com, bnowack@appmosphere.com, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Danny Ayers wrote: > Sorry, did I miss something here? What I see in Norm's vocab [1] is > use of singular properties, but without any cardinality restrictions. > A list of names can be expressed as e.g. : > > _:mycard > vCard:fn "Daniel John Ayers" ; > vCard:additionalName "Danny Ayers" ; > vCard:additionalName "Danny J. Ayers" ; > vCard:additionalName "DJ Ayers" ; > ... The issue is whether to do: vcard:givenName "Danny J." ... or: vcard:givenName "Danny J." vcard:givenName "J." ... or: vcard:givenName ( "Danny" "J.") The family, given, additional properties are for pieces of full names. Norm restricted cardinality to 1 on these, and so chose the first approach. I strongly supported this move. Two doesn't work. Garret wants to allow something like the third approach. This discussion is all about resolving this question. Bruce
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2007 12:36:52 UTC