- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:07:15 -0400
- To: Linking Open Data <linking-open-data@simile.mit.edu>
- CC: 'Sandro Hawke' <sandro@w3.org>, 'SW-forum' <semantic-web@w3.org>, "'Benjamins, Robin'" <rxbenjam@bechtel.com>, "'Paap, Onno'" <onno.paap@gmail.com>
Hans Teijgeler wrote: > Hi Sandro, > > What else does a non-information resource contain (other than the > information that it exists and what it is in essence)? > > Regards, > Hans > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org] > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 15:41 > To: Hans Teijgeler > Cc: 'Linking Open Data'; SW-forum; Paap, Onno; Benjamins, Robin > Subject: Re: Terminology Question concerning Web Architecture and Linked > Data > > > "Hans Teijgeler" <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl> writes: > >> To me the distinction between information and non-information >> resources is non-existing, because what you call a non-information >> resource actually contains information as well >> > > But it doesn't contain *only* information. Information Resources are things > which can be entirely and completely encoded as bits and then transmitted > over a network. They can be copied, perfectly. They can be serialized. > They are pure information. (Another name I suggested for this class was > "Digital Artifact", but the TAG went with "Information Resource" instead.) > > That, it seems to me, is a fairly crisp and useful class to define when > talking about computer systems like the Web. > > -- Sandro > Sandro, Yes, but what is a non-information resource :-) This is the problem. Something that is technically right (i.e. the opposite of an information resource) but a poor vehicle of communication when articulating identifying and dereferencing distributed objects connected by the Web Bus. Generic Resource or Data Resource provide a cleaner description of something that isn't ready for Web Bus traversal in it's basic form. This matter is just about terminology that enables us build a bridge from the core Semantic Web community, out to the broader Web Communities. Here are some Links that dig into this issue of non-information resource terminology: 1. http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html (uses: Generic Resource) 2. *http://www.mkbergman.com/?p=391 (uses: Structured Data Resource) * I can live with Structured Data Resource (Data Resource for short) or even Generic Resource. The non-information resource completely turns my head inside out :-( -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2007 14:07:23 UTC