W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > January 2007

Re: RSS Conversion

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:38:02 +0900
Message-Id: <5F8B006D-A62B-48B7-96BF-0E90078285C9@w3.org>
Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
To: Akaash Maharaj <akaash.maharaj@yahoo.com>


Le 15 janv. 2007 à 08:46, Akaash Maharaj a écrit :
>      After reading through this newsgroup, I was
> wondering if the issue of RDF as a standard for RSS
> newsfeeds (i.e. RSS 1.0) is part of this group's
> interests.
>
>      It seems that RDF-based RSS 1.0 has clearly been
> overtaken by RSS 2.0, despite the former's greater
> power and readiness for the semantic web.  Are there
> any plans to attempt to create an RSS >2 that might
> give RDF RSS a chance to make a comeback?


RSS 2.0 is XML, RSS 1.0 is RDF/XML.


RSS 1.1 was an attempt to fix the problem of RSS 1.0. But not well  
implemented as far as I know.  Unfortunately. We are lacking of an  
implementation report

See
     http://inamidst.com/rss1.1/
     http://inamidst.com/rss1.1/guide


Atom has been created to try to solve all the issues that were  
encountered with RSS 2.0. It  is XML syntax (not RDF) and became an  
RFC 4287 recently.  There is a table comparing RSS 2.0 and Atom.

     http://atomenabled.org/
     http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4287
     http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/Rss20AndAtom10Compared


Danny Ayers and Henry Story have pushed for a model of Atom in OWL/RDF

      http://atomowl.org/



-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 15 January 2007 02:38:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:41:02 UTC