W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > January 2007

RE: Axiom: Opacity of URIs

From: Xiaoshu Wang <wangxiao@musc.edu>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:07:02 -0500
To: <rreck@rrecktek.com>, <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000901c73336$a6e933a0$4a741780@bioxiao>


> I run into the same situation when I want to manage 
> definitions for words from multiple communities of interest. 
> The word "frequency" has slightly different meanings in the 
> domain of mathematics, physics or signal processing. Again, 
> it is attractive to have derivable URI's.

Here is my two cents on it.

I think they - English/French expression of pain vs. different meanings of
the word "frequency" - are two different situiations.  IMHO, one concept
should be assigned with one URI.  Pain is "pain", it does not matter how you
yell it out.  So, in this case there should be ONE URI for that concept.  On
the other hand, if two "frequencies" has different meanings, there should be
TWO URIs for expressing them.

Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 15:07:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:41:54 UTC