W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > February 2007

Re: [vcard] OWL or RDF for vCard?

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 10:18:58 +0100
Message-Id: <77007095-C0B4-43E9-A938-7899319C9034@cyganiak.de>
Cc: 'Semantic Web' <semantic-web@w3.org>
To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>

Question to all ...

On 5 Feb 2007, at 07:46, Harry Halpin wrote:
> What do people think? Keep it in OWL? Are all the cardinality
> constraints Norm has right?
>
> Or move it to RDF and throw cardinality constraints out the window?

Well, the case for staying with RDF/S is pretty clear -- keep it simple.

What's the case for going OWL? What compelling features could we  
build into applications that would be impossible or much harder if  
there are no OWL cardinality constraints in the vCard vocabulary?

Cheers
Richard


>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> 		-harry
>
> Harry Halpin,  University of Edinburgh
> http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 5 February 2007 09:19:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:44:59 UTC