Re: RDF/XML and named graphs

Find here some uses (reports and software) described for explicit graph 
names:

1. Networked graphs providing (possibly recursive) views on other 
resources:
    
https://www.uni-koblenz.de/FB4/Institutes/IFI/AGStaab/Research/NetworkedGraphs

2. Querying for meta knowledge (provenance, certainty, source document, 
etc.),
    which is stated about a graph as a whole (yes, "IRI1 a Graph" would 
be useful here):
    
https://www.uni-koblenz.de/FB4/Institutes/IFI/AGStaab/Research/MetaKnowledge

Cheers,
Steffen

Peter Ansell schrieb:
> Just skimming through that submission it is unclear why one would want
> to publish a document which included sources from multiple different
> graphs interweaved. Is this document an authoritative reference for
> the triples from each of the graphs? Could you definitely retrieve the
> graph source from its original definition and match the definitions?
> Duplicating information seems to lend itself to hazards with importing
> two graphs into the same store...
>
> It would however be very helpful if it was your desire to augment the
> original graph without having the authority to do so.
>
> Peter
>
> On 18/12/2007, Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr> wrote:
>   
>> Hello,
>>
>> W3C just published a member submission that may be relevant to this
>> discussion:
>>
>>     RDF/XML Source Declaration
>>     Submitted by INRIA on 06 September 2007
>>     Published on 17 December 2007
>>     http://www.w3.org/Submission/rdfsource/
>>
>>     Submission
>>     http://www.w3.org/Submission/2007/09/
>>
>>     W3C Staff Comment
>>      http://www.w3.org/Submission/2007/09/Comment
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> --
>> Fabien - http://ns.inria.fr/fabien.gandon/
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2007 14:05:02 UTC