- From: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:06:42 +1000
- To: "Fabien Gandon" <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>, "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Cc: p.roe@qut.edu.au, j.hogan@qut.edu.au
Just skimming through that submission it is unclear why one would want to publish a document which included sources from multiple different graphs interweaved. Is this document an authoritative reference for the triples from each of the graphs? Could you definitely retrieve the graph source from its original definition and match the definitions? Duplicating information seems to lend itself to hazards with importing two graphs into the same store... It would however be very helpful if it was your desire to augment the original graph without having the authority to do so. Peter On 18/12/2007, Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr> wrote: > > Hello, > > W3C just published a member submission that may be relevant to this > discussion: > > RDF/XML Source Declaration > Submitted by INRIA on 06 September 2007 > Published on 17 December 2007 > http://www.w3.org/Submission/rdfsource/ > > Submission > http://www.w3.org/Submission/2007/09/ > > W3C Staff Comment > http://www.w3.org/Submission/2007/09/Comment > > Cheers, > > -- > Fabien - http://ns.inria.fr/fabien.gandon/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2007 00:06:53 UTC