Re: RDF/XML and named graphs

I was thinking less of whether it would be considered legal by  
parsers, but whether the semantics would be corrupted.
Initially you have triples segregated into graphs, but for an old  
parser you have a single graph and some extra triples.
Could there be nasty misunderstandings?
-Alan

On Dec 13, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

> On backward compatibility, if the attribute is only used on typed  
> nodes and/or rdf:Description nodes, then it is always legal in RDF/ 
> XML 2004 - and a few additional triples are generated, with  
> predicate rdf:graph.
>