Re: RDF/XML and named graphs

Max Voelkel wrote:
> Eh, why not using TRiX [1] ?
> 

TRiX is sort of minimalist ...

I guess I am trying to suggest a small change, with an eye to backward 
compatibility , without opening up Bijan's can of triples

On backward compatibility, if the attribute is only used on typed nodes 
and/or rdf:Description nodes, then it is always legal in RDF/XML 2004 - 
and a few additional triples are generated, with predicate rdf:graph.


Jeremy

Received on Thursday, 13 December 2007 18:19:13 UTC