W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > August 2007

Re: RDF's curious literals

From: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:58:21 +0200
Message-Id: <133980A8-05FA-4ACE-9702-3B8808BB465C@bblfish.net>
Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
To: Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com>

Please write this question out in N3, using the right namespaces. You  
may find the solution form itself as you type it out, or you will  
make it very clear to us what you are looking for.


On 2 Aug 2007, at 17:45, Garret Wilson wrote:

> Even if we prefer to write 123 and "123", why do we need *the  
> datatype of a typed literal in the RDF abstract syntax* when we can  
> simply use rdf:type set to xsd:Integer?
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2007 15:58:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:41:05 UTC