- From: cr <_@whats-your.name>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:18:25 -0400
- To: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
> Even if we prefer to write 123 and "123", why do we need *the datatype of a > typed literal in the RDF abstract syntax* when we can simply use rdf:type > set to xsd:Integer? why do we need rdf:Datatype or rdf:type for literals when we can simply not use them? JSON for serialization - the types are implicit in the encoding - and native language types when in memory - i added typed-literals to an app this morning and theres certainly no visible type tags anywhere - theyre somewhere deep in the parsing and implementation layers of the tools used.. > > Garret
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2007 17:18:36 UTC