W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Restrictions on Bags and Seqs content

From: Michael Schneider <m_schnei@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:52:11 +0200
Message-ID: <461D4A7B.2030303@gmx.de>
To: rogargon@gmail.com
CC: matthew.pocock@ncl.ac.uk, alanruttenberg@gmail.com, semantic-web@w3.org, public-owl-dev@w3.org

Hi again, Roberto!

Roberto García wrote on Wed, 11 Apr 2007:

> The List approach seems more clean but, due to compatibility issues
> with XMP, I'm forced to consider Bag and Seq.
> My question is: if I'm not constrained to OWL-DL, is it possible to
> constrain rdfs:member in order to simplify the whole thing?

If it is ok for you that your ontology will fall into OWL/Full (e.g. if 
all you want to do is conceptional modeling), then: Yes! 'rdfs:member' 
is only disallowed vocabulary within OWL/DL.

Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 20:52:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:00 UTC