- From: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuellegutierrez@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:55:33 +0200
- To: <danbri@danbri.org>, <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Cc: <ot@w3.org>
Thanks Dan, I agree with you, the RDF validator is a very good tool and their graphing facility is very interesting. So, I must say too: thanks W3C. Best regards, Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo Fundación Sidar Coordinadora del SIDAR www.sidar.org Email: coordina@sidar.org Tel.: +34 - 91 725 71 47 -----Mensaje original----- De: semantic-web-request@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] En nombre de Dan Brickley Enviado el: miércoles, 20 de septiembre de 2006 11:31 Para: semantic-web@w3.org CC: ot@w3.org Asunto: [Fwd: RDF Validator moved to new server - graph issues gone] I'm forwarding this to a wider audience, as I know the RDF Validator graphing facility was used and appreciated by many on the SWIG discussion list. Thanks to the W3C folks for keeping it running and moving it to a better server! For those who don't know what I'm talking about: http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ The RDF validator there checks your RDF syntax (using ARP, the RDF parser from Jena). If you select 'Triples and Graph' it generates a graphical view of your data (using GraphViz for layout). cheers, Dan ps. I have a bookmarklet at http://danbri.org/words/2005/07/30/114 (plus a long tract on various different interpretations of 'rdf validator'); the bookmarklet defaults to not generating graphs btw.
Received on Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:09:26 UTC