- From: Andrea Splendiani <andrea@pasteur.fr>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 23:53:50 +0200
- To: ben syverson <w3@likn.org>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Be careful not to confuse OO semantics with RDFS/OWL semantics. "Inherits" and properties in general may be confusing if you think in OO terms. But this is another thread... ciao, A. Il giorno 19/set/06, alle ore 23:32, ben syverson ha scritto: > > > On Sep 19, 2006, at 4:23 PM, Andrea Splendiani wrote: > >>> Is there anything wrong with creating individuals with multiple >>> rdf:type declarations? >> To my understanding, this is quite natural "per se". > > Great -- I had assumed so, but couldn't find any specific > information in the specs to back up my assumption... > >> If the classes are not disjoint... MacBookPro will satisfy all >> definitions of the three classes, including the properties >> restriction that define it. > > Excellent -- the ontologies generated by likn don't employ > owl:disjointWith, so that shouldn't be a problem. > > Thanks! > > - ben syverson > likn.org >
Received on Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:53:47 UTC