On Sep 19, 2006, at 4:23 PM, Andrea Splendiani wrote: >> Is there anything wrong with creating individuals with multiple >> rdf:type declarations? > To my understanding, this is quite natural "per se". Great -- I had assumed so, but couldn't find any specific information in the specs to back up my assumption... > If the classes are not disjoint... MacBookPro will satisfy all > definitions of the three classes, including the properties > restriction that define it. Excellent -- the ontologies generated by likn don't employ owl:disjointWith, so that shouldn't be a problem. Thanks! - ben syverson likn.orgReceived on Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:33:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:44:58 UTC