- From: Yoshio Fukushige <fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 19:32:47 +0900
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com, semantic-web@w3.org
Thanks a lot, Ivan. (I'm always amazed by your quick responses! :-) On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:22:10 +0200 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Yoshio, > > if my understanding is correct, then what you are asking for is what the > description logic people call the 'qualified cardinality restriction'. > And, indeed, you cannot express it in OWL. Sorry for my awkward English, but you understand me correctly. Oh, one cannot express it(= qualified number restriction)... orz > This is one of the features that OWL1.1 guys are thinking of adding to > OWL in future: > > http://www-db.research.bell-labs.com/user/pfps/owl/syntax-20060614.html > > [Note that, for the time being, OWL1.1 is *not* a W3C work, though it > may become one, eventually...] Thank you for the pointer to the exciting new work! I hope it will reach the maturity to become a W3C work soon. But with your help, I found Alan and Guus'es Editors Draft (in SWBPDWG): Qualified cardinality restrictions (QCRs): Constraining the number of values of a particular type for a property [1] (though it hasn't reached Working Note status yet but remains editor's draft) I find the "unendorsed" "valuesFrom" property very nice and would like to use it for the time being. But which namespace should I use for that? Is there any de facto namespace, any suggestions? [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/QCR/ Best, Yoshio fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com -- Yoshio Fukushige <fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com> Network Development Center, Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.
Received on Friday, 8 September 2006 10:31:57 UTC