- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:11:48 -0600
- To: Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 15:54 +0000, Norman Gray wrote: > Greetings. Thanks for the background info... [...] > Thus rather than > > > I suggest obsoleting 2006/vcard/ns#latitude > > in favor of 2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#lat > > ...it would probably be more sensible to go in the other direction, > and say > > > geo:lat rdfs:subPropertyOf vcard:latitude > > and nothing more. In particular, it would probably be best to leave > the vCard lat/long as informally specified, and let WGS84, and ITRS, > and ..., coordinates to be subProperties of them, for those few > specialists who care. Well, I see your point, but I think it's handy to have lat/long in its own namespace, independent of issues about 5 first names and such ;-) So I'd rather detach the 2003/01/geo namespace from wgs84. Umm... darn; too bad the wgs84 is baked in. DanBri, what's your take? Anybody know if the Geo XG has collected any relevant info? I'd look, but I got locked out of w3.org while doing GRDDL testing. Oops. "Specifically, we received at least 500 requests for the same resource (URI) from your IP address within a ten-minute time interval." -- http://www.w3.org/Help/abuse-info/re-reqs.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2006 17:12:00 UTC