- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 20:08:51 +0200
- To: "Max Völkel" <voelkel@fzi.de>
- Cc: semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 5/30/06, Max Völkel <voelkel@fzi.de> wrote: > > Hi Andrea and all, > > as URIs are a cornerstone of RDF and then in turn of the ontology > languages layered on RDF, it would make sense to me, to have an > rdfe:sameAs > property in the yet-to-be-defined rdf-extensions namespace. > The semantics of this could be that a tool processing data is > allowed to normalise all URIs to ONE of the given rdfe:sameAs URIs. > Maybe even state a preferred URI: > rdf:mainURI > to which we normalise. I can see how this could be useful, but on the one hand what would it offer that isn't already available in RDFS/OWL? ...on the other, wouldn't it open a whole new can of worms for RDF semantics? If I understand correctly, what is (apparently) lacking is something that behaves something like HTTP 3xx codes maybe with wildcards like Apache mod_rewrite, only without the HTTP. I suppose owl:sameAs causes problems in its lack of uniformity (from the URI point of view), in that saying two classes are the same has very different implications than saying two individuals are the same. It's not hard to imagine a preprocessor taking care of the preferred URI selection at the syntax level, but this doesn't make the complexity issues with mixing individuals and classes/properties go away. I'm pretty sure something could be hacked together right now using regexs and/or rules, but for a general solution it does seem like messing with the opacity of URIs. Maybe I've misunderstood the problem, or am looking at it wrongly, but I don't see any easy solution that would add to what we've got. Whatever, I do think it would be useful if someone could clarify the requirements here, what is lacking? There's an RFC which says whether or not two URIs are (probably) the same, so I'm assuming this is about determining whether the resources they identify are the same. Or does it go further, into saying that specific representations of two resources are the same? That's probably a Pandora's Box (of worms). Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2006 18:08:57 UTC