- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <swlists-040405@champin.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 18:17:13 +0200
- To: Andrea Splendiani <andrea.splendiani@unimib.it>
- CC: semantic-web@w3.org
Andrea Splendiani a écrit : > > Hi everybody, > > Is there a way to assert that two URIs are equivalent ? > > In owl, sameAs allows to specify the equivalence of two individuals, but > when applied to classes this would make the ontology OWL-full. > > In any case I would like to assert that two URIs, no matter their > meaning, are the same. > Let's say I'm defining these URIs, and for "legacy" reason I have two > different "spellings". How should I deal with this situation ? if the URIs denote individual, use owl:sameAs if the URIs denote classes, use owl:equivalentClass if the URIs denote properties, use owl:equivalentProperty if you are not sure about what they denote (either because one of them denotes sometimes an individual and sometimes a class, or because both do not denote the same kind of thing), then you are *already* in OWL-Full... In OWL-DL (and Lite), the sets of classes, individuals and properties are disjoint, so there should be no ambiguity. pa > > best, > Andrea Splendiani >
Received on Monday, 29 May 2006 16:50:30 UTC