- From: Pdm <editor@content-wire.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 23:16:55 +0100
- To: Azamat <abdoul@cytanet.com.cy>
- CC: ONTAC-WG General Discussion <ontac-forum@colab.cim3.net>, semantic-web@w3.org
Thanks Azamat Well, it does not happen often that fragments of such old lecture notes can be referenced meaningfully in a conversation. So, if I understand you right, while semiotics can be seen as a branch of semantics concerned with the meaning of signs, for the purpose of our ontology study semiotics can be defined as 'semantics' in the broader sense of the word. I guess in binary code there is no distinction between words and a signs, but I wonder if at application level where data is expressed as natural language a conceptual distinction could be of value. I think I am going to brush up my old notes Thanks for the clarification PDM > > <Paola Di Maio>... To me semantics is the meaning of words, and > semiotis is the meaning of non verbal communication, ie signs and > symbols. > Please correct me where I am wrong, > > Paola, > > It was nice to hear from you, and i am glad that you enjoyed the > company of Umberto Eco, who used to explain the complexitities of > semiotics, meanings and ambiguity by fictional works, like The Name of > the Rose. > > As for the issue you arose, both versions have right to exist. In a > narrow sense, Semantics is a linguistic branch caring about the > language significance (linguistic signs), while in a broader meaning, > it is what i suggested below. > > [Semantics is aimed to provide a general theory of meaning relations > between signs, constructs and things, assigning signification to > syntactic structures and meanings to conceptual structures.] > > At this level, we still abstracted from the pragmatic aspects of > meaning, i.e., the user of the language (the agent of communication, > interpretant); for the production of meaning as well as the processes > whereby an agent (animal, human or robot) assigns signification to > signs more relate to empirical sciences such as psycholinguistics, > history, anthropology. > Adding pragmatical and syntactic dimensions, you come to semiotics > studying the nature of signs, which are generally of three sorts > (natural, mental and cultural (conventional)), as it was discussed > before: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign. > > Regards, > Azamat > >>> >>> > >> >> >> >> > > > >
Received on Thursday, 25 May 2006 22:17:08 UTC