- From: Martin Hepp \(DERI\) <martin.hepp@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:47:04 +0100
- To: "'Henry Story'" <henry.story@bblfish.net>, "'Semantic Web'" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hi Henry: You are so damn right - I personally think that the pure existence of RDF/XML has been a major inhibitor for the spread of RDF, since many XML-educated people are unable to take of the XML glasses... Best Martin --------------------------- martin.hepp@deri.org, phone: +43 512 507 6465 http://www.heppnetz.de / http://www.deri.org -----Original Message----- From: semantic-web-request@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Henry Story Sent: Freitag, 10. März 2006 14:40 To: Semantic Web Subject: add Turtle examples to specs RDF is quite easy conceptually. But we all know that rdf/xml makes things difficult. Sadly people who come get interested in it, and after finding that they can't completely rely on Protege, start wanting to write their own stuff. They therefore turn to the docs [1] for good style. Sadly it is full of xml/rdf which makes their life really difficult. Please just add turtle examples (turtle is a subset of N3 right?) to the specs. Or please someone put up a translated version somewhere else. It will make explaining this a lot easier. Henry [1] such as http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/
Received on Friday, 10 March 2006 18:16:51 UTC