- From: Xiaoshu Wang <wangxiao@musc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 14:22:04 -0400
- To: "'Richard Newman'" <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'Semantic Web'" <semantic-web@w3.org>
--Richard, > (a) most URIs are not dereferenceable, because common rules > for dereferencing them do not exist, or they are designed not to be; What do you mean "common rules" for derefernecing? What is the rule to dereference an HTTP URI, like http://www.w3.org? Can you de-reference it? > (b) most HTTP URIs do not dereference to a useful RDF representation; So what? > (c) using fragment identifiers gives you a slightly better > chance of dereferencing to a useful representation, because > of HTTP's mechanics. How so? How will http://foo.com/#abc give me a better chance to dereference than http://foo.com/abc? Where did you get this idea? > Reliance on the dereferenceability of a term, even an HTTP > URI, is foolhardy. You haven't truly comprehend the essense of semantic web yet. Read this info: http://esw.w3.org/topic/FollowLinksForMoreInformation Xiaoshu
Received on Sunday, 30 July 2006 18:22:24 UTC