- From: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 10:30:56 -0700
- To: "Xiaoshu Wang" <wangxiao@musc.edu>
- Cc: "'Semantic Web'" <semantic-web@w3.org>
My point was nothing more than: (a) most URIs are not dereferenceable, because common rules for dereferencing them do not exist, or they are designed not to be; (b) most HTTP URIs do not dereference to a useful RDF representation; (c) using fragment identifiers gives you a slightly better chance of dereferencing to a useful representation, because of HTTP's mechanics. Reliance on the dereferenceability of a term, even an HTTP URI, is foolhardy. -R > We are talking about IF a resource is dereferencable but not HOW a > resource > can be dereferenced. Whehter using fragment identifier is > irrelevant, don't > you think? Again, let's not steer away the direction. Otherwise, > we will > have endless debate on anything.
Received on Sunday, 30 July 2006 17:31:07 UTC