- From: Stephen Rhoads <rhoadsnyc@mac.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:16:03 -0500
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
- Cc: Giovanni Tummarello <g.tummarello@gmail.com>
Good point. I haven't been paying attention for a while, but have we yet solved the problem of how to query the Originator of a URI for an RDF description of that URI? >Http where do you exactly get the statements about >http://example.com/philosophycal_concepts#freedom ? certainly nothing >interesting lies on example.com, or nothing surprising anyway. Stuff >that would make users go "wow" probably lies in DBs around. A "proper" >"transport layer" would therefore somehow automatically (e.g. without >explicitally namid the sources, else you're i nthe Sparql/named >graph/well known db integration approach) connect those who ask about >#freedom with those who write about it. >Like URIQA but automatically across the semantic web, something P2P a >bit like RDFPeers (DHT storage of RDF graphs), but without the huge >traffic generated at each query. RDFGrowth attemts to display such >features, we'll see if it will be of any use once deployed publically. > >Giovanni > > >
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2006 22:16:11 UTC