- From: Hans Teijgeler <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:41:36 +0100
- To: "'Peter F. Patel-Schneider'" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <semantic-web@w3.org>
Peter, Thanks! (the repeated nonNegativeInteger was not my input, but caused by the software at W3C side.) Regards, Hans -----Original Message----- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider [mailto:pfps@research.bell-labs.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 14:37 To: hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl Cc: semantic-web@w3.org Subject: Re: owl:onProperty with enumeration From: "Hans Teijgeler" <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl> Subject: RE: owl:onProperty with enumeration Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:14:46 +0100 > Peter, > > Thanks for your response! > > When you say: "The syntax here may not be exactly right" then you > invite my next question: What's wrong with it? Well, I didn't have access to the appropriate documentation at the time, so I wasn't exactly sure whether I got all the details correct. > I *did* create an enumerated class "BlackWhiteRed": > > <owl:Class rdf:ID="BlackWhiteRed"> > <owl:unionOf rdf:parseType="Collection"> > <owl:Class rdf:about="#Black"/> > <owl:Class rdf:about="#White"/> > <owl:Class rdf:about="#Red"/> > </owl:unionOf> > </owl:Class> > > I *did* use that class in a Restriction: > > <rdfs:subClassOf> > <owl:Restriction> > <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#hasColor"/> > <owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="#BlackWhiteRed"/> > <owl:maxCardinality rdf:datatype=" > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger > <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger> > ">1</owl:maxCardinality> > </owl:Restriction> > </rdfs:subClassOf> > > so where is it "not exactly right"? Please enlighten me. Well, this indeed may be exactly what you want, except for the repeated nonNegativeInteger which I expect is not right. The only (other) differences that I can see between what you did and what I did was maxCardinality vs cardinality and your subClassOf. If you had problems parsing your example, I would suspect that the subClassOf is the problem. > Regards, > Hans peter
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 13:41:58 UTC