- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:32:42 +0100
- To: semantic_web@googlegroups.com
- Cc: "Semantic web list" <semantic-web@w3.org>
[from semantic_web@googlegroups.com, cc'd to semantic-web@w3.org] > On 12/24/06, hafiz <hhammad@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, can any body recommend me some papers about comparison of OWL lite, > > DL and Full showing what can be done with each of them and what can not > > be done, or why compatational gaurantee can not be given with OWL Full, > > Thanks, Hafiz On 25/12/06, Josef PetrĂ¡k <jspetrak@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I do not know if this - http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/ - suites all > your needs but a short comparism of supported features in each version > is included in this document. - plus there are also the specifications themselves, and also the RDF layers - http://www.w3.org/RDF/ Offhand the only relevant paper I can think of, which covers the background to OWL from a DL-oriented point of view, is: From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The Making of a Web Ontology Language http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~horrocks/Publications/download/2003/HoPH03a.pdf Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Wednesday, 27 December 2006 13:32:53 UTC