- From: Leo Sauermann <leo.sauermann@dfki.de>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:58:31 +0100
- To: Aldo Bucchi <aldo.bucchi@gmail.com>
- CC: semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <457D1DB7.9070605@dfki.de>
yes, its reinventing the wheel. the buzzword name for the idea is most probably "semantic web services" and there is a gazillion publications on how to describe them, discover them, automatically connect them, map them, exchange them, .... a "down-to-earth-simple" approach is, for example, this one: http://www.springerlink.com/content/h81x123477248232/?p=53b388d08be94a01a9e28edffbde5219&pi=25 http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/09a39cb2fa25bbd58cfc0853ba6f85fa3/leobard @inproceedings{DBLP <http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/%7Eley/db/about/bibtex.html>:conf/pakm/TakabayashiNTFY06, author = {Yuya Takabayashi and Harutaka Niwa and Mitsuharu Taneda and Naoki Fukuta and Takahira Yamaguchi}, title = {Managing Many Web Service Compositions by Task Decomposition and Service Quality Evaluation.}, booktitle = {PAKM}, year = {2006}, pages = {291-302}, ee = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11944935_26}, crossref = {DBLP:conf/pakm/2006}, bibsource = {DBLP, http://dblp.uni-trier.de} } greetz Leo Es begab sich aber da Aldo Bucchi zur rechten Zeit 05.12.2006 10:08 folgendes schrieb: > > Hi all, > > Don't you hate it ( or love it in a subtly twisted way ) when you run > across the very same "I bet no one's ever done this" feature you've > been working heads down for last two nights? > > Well, this time its about this RDFIO thingy... a declarative way to > wrap services. > I had two names for it... the first was RDF BAGs ( before/after graphs > ) or RDFio, but liked the former because it emphasizes the "wrapping" > action and the latter is just too dumb. > > Anyway, > > Is there any further work around this? > say... RIROs & REST for example.. > > ( noticed how rest has become a little unrestful these days? ) > > I've had a lot of fun trying to create some simple algorithms to > undertsand at a higher level the cost and amount of arc traversals > that could be made over a set of BAG-wrapped services ( ok... RIRO > services ). Would make for a nice paper, server yourselves. > > Another neraby issue... does anyone know if there's a "query service > description" taxonomy /vocabulary? > When using this wrappers there is a recurrent need to specify further > "capabilities" of the service. > > I need a way to state that > > paramA, fulltext search filter > paramB, mask filter ( full match ) > sort on B > sort on C > the service provides a count() service ( taking the same params but on > another URL, or passing a flag, or using OPTIONS, who knows ) > > get the point? > > I believe that with this new REST momentum there is pretty nice chance > to leap this evident gap and push rdf closer to mainstream. To me, > it's clear that one fundamental mistake in the marketing of the sw has > been neglecting the need ( and value ) of these simple "recipes". > > We are missing the glue... the transport. > > I'm now leading a big (10-20 devs) project and I'm willing to give RDF > a try as the framework for integrating part of the data ( mashup )... > again, I twistedly love the pain found in early adoption. > > Any pointers appreciated! > > -- ____________________________________________________ DI Leo Sauermann http://www.dfki.de/~sauermann DFKI GmbH P.O. Box 2080 Fon: +49 631 205-3503 67608 Kaiserslautern Fax: +49 631 205-3472 Germany Mail: leo.sauermann@dfki.de ____________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 11 December 2006 08:59:00 UTC