- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 21:10:48 +0900
- To: Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>
- Cc: "'Damian Steer'" <damian.steer@hp.com>, <semantic-web@w3.org>
Le 1 déc. 2006 à 02:07, Chris Bizer a écrit :
>> I'm a bit concerned about amazon's licencing conditions. I suppose
>> this
>> is ok since you're just representing their data, but downstream users
>> ought to be aware that B.6 [1] might bite them.
>
> Yes, licensing is problematic ;-(
I think IMDB (Amazon) would also represent some copyrights problems.
http://www.imdb.com/interfaces
Accessible Database of IMDB
Licensing Information
http://us.imdb.com/Licensing/
Simon Rozet has explained what he was doing with movie reviews for
example
http://atonie.org/journal/2006/11/04/decrire-les-films-vus-en-rdf
http://atonie.org/journal/2006/11/25/films-visionnes-et-rdf-partie-2
I wish that wikipedia had a fully exportable database
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_films
For example, being able to export all data of this movie as RDF,
maybe a templating issue at least for the box on the right.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2046_%28film%29
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 1 December 2006 12:11:28 UTC