W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > August 2006

RE: INSEE releases OWL ontology and RDF data for ?geographical?entities

From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:00:22 +0200
To: Hans Teijgeler <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>
Cc: 'Xiaoshu Wang' <wangxiao@musc.edu>, 'Dan Connolly' <connolly@w3.org>, semantic-web@w3.org, public-xg-geo@w3.org
Message-Id: <1154876422.21743.5.camel@localhost>
Le dimanche 06 août 2006 à 16:32 +0200, Hans Teijgeler a écrit : 
> Eric,
> You quoted:
> "It is recommended that implementors of RDF serializers, in order to break a
> URI into a namespace name and a local name, split it after the last XML
> non-NCName character, ensuring that the first character of the name is a
> Letter or '_'. If the URI ends in a non-NCName character then throw a "this
> graph cannot be serialized in RDF/XML" exception or error."
> Please help me understand: 
> What is weird on those URIs?

You need to go back in the context set by Xiaoshu's mail to which I was

Xiaoshu wrote:

"The reason for me to raise this question is this.  Unlike hash URI, the
namespace URI can not be "inferred" or "guessed" from a URI itself.  For
instance, a URI of http://foo.com/bar can be constructed with namespace
http://foo.com/, http://foo.com/b or http://foo.com/ba coupled with
local ID
of "bar", "ar" and "r", respectively."

He meant that a URI such as http://foo.com/bar can be obtained by a
namespace name http://foo.com/b and a local name "ar":

<ar xmlns="http://foo.com/b"/>

This would of course be a bad practise and he was mentioning that he
thought the W3C should clearly forbid that.

My remark is that if <ar xmlns="http://foo.com/b"/> would be interpreted
as http://foo.com/bar, it would be serialised back as <bar
xmlns="http://foo.com/"/> (thus my comment about the fact that with
these "weird URIs", XML/RDF -> RDF store -> XML/RDF roundtrips would be
still more broken that it is generally the case).

That's all what I meant, nothing more :) ...


GPG-PGP: 2A528005
Don't you think all these XML schema languages should work together?
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG   ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema

Received on Sunday, 6 August 2006 15:00:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:41:00 UTC