- From: Damian Steer <damian.steer@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:51:38 +0100
- To: danny.ayers@gmail.com
- CC: Hans Teijgeler <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>, semantic-web-request@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Danny Ayers wrote: > On 9/18/05, Damian Steer <damian.steer@hp.com> wrote: >>2) RDF -> RDF: Rules language, eg n3, jena rules, swrl. Stay out of xml >>here. > > > Yep. The n3/cwm tutorial is pretty good on this: > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/ > You may be able to do the logic using *standard* RDFS/OWL inference - > cwm, Euler, Jena, Pellet, one of the DL reasoners. > > Depending on what you're trying to do SPARQL may be an option here > too, using CONSTRUCT. /me beats head on table. How did I forget CONSTRUCT? Yes, pretty nice for (very) simple rules. > A twisty possibility might also be to follow the route - > > [RDF] SPARQL -> xml results -> xslt/xquery -> RDF/XML Sneaky, 1 & 3 combined :-) Similar, in some respects, to how CONSTRUCT works. This might be a neat trick if you want to do some calculations or value munging. Damian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDLsJqAyLCB+mTtykRAqUVAJ4iCIxQRtB8aWAUaXScwKuUY3CNGQCgutpy cypKAUCtAUbz5J7gaBsIHQ8= =7qmY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 19 September 2005 13:53:54 UTC