- From: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:20:59 +0100
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
Xavier Noria wrote: > In RDFS and friends properties do not "belong" to classes, whereas in > OOP normally they do. For instance, if you've got an instance of > foaf:Person you cannot assume there's any assertion about foaf:interest > for him. Look at it the other way around. If you could assume that there was a foaf:interest assserted for every foaf:Person then any foaf:Person without a foaf:interest asserted would be invalid, hence it would be impossible to say anything about anyone without giving at least one foaf:interest which you may neither know nor care about. An application concerned with people's medical history will not care about the same information as one concerned with their professional qualifications and so on. It *is* possible to say that, for example, all people have mothers, however knowing that there is a single value for the _ex:biologicalMother property of every person does not mean that you will be informed as to who that person's mother is.
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 09:16:15 UTC