RE: Literals as subjects

Hi Graham and Danny,

We already use the XML Schema data types as owl:Class, see


-----Original Message-----
From: [] On
Behalf Of Graham Klyne
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 7:07 PM
To: Danny Ayers
Cc: semantic-web at W3C
Subject: Literals as subjects

Danny Ayers wrote:
> (I must confess I'm not sure where the logicians are at on the general
> question - literals as subjects etc).

My understanding is that the logicians have no fundamental problem with
literals-as-subjects; cf. this response from Bijan Parsia about a question
mine to DAWG:


Graham Klyne
For email:

Received on Thursday, 24 November 2005 09:34:17 UTC